Archive for the ‘Bill Pavelic’ Category

Chase for Escapee Rape Suspect

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007

The chase for escapee rape suspect Andrew Luster continued Tuesday as Ven-tura County law enforcement officials sifted through dozens of potential leads while at the same time trying to compile enough information to obtain a federal arrest warrant.

Investigators have been checking airports and looking at bank and cellular phone records in an attempt to track down the 39-year-old great-grandson of cos-metics magnate Max Factor. They suspect Luster, who faces a life prison sentence if convicted of drugging and raping three women, jumped his $1-million bail last week during a break in his trial. 

Tips on Luster’s possible whereabouts poured in Tuesday in response to news reports of his flight, said Eric Nishimoto, spokesman for the Ventura County Sheriff’s Department.
The Sheriff’s Department and the Ventura County district attorney’s office each have one investigator working on the case, as well as backup investigators. “Obviously, we have limited resources,” Nishimoto said.

That is one reason why local authorities are trying to obtain federal assis-tance.

During the last two days, prosecutors have scrambled to compile information that would enable the FBI to obtain an arrest warrant for Luster and give them authority to investigate leads in foreign countries.

At the same time, authorities are working to put together a list of leads on places Luster may have gone — homes of relatives, former girlfriends or friends, and any of his previous residences.

Meanwhile, Luster’s criminal trial continued in his absence.

Santa Monica-based attorney Roger Jon Diamond stood alone at the defense counsel table, his bulky briefcase parked in the chair where his client once sat alongside a four-member defense team.

Co-counsel Kiana Sloan-Hillier walked out Monday after Superior Court Judge Ken Riley declared Luster a fugitive and issued a warrant for his arrest. She has yet to return.

Investigator Bill Pavelic, a former Los Angeles police officer, also walked out — angrily clutching his briefcase — after prosecutors called him as a wit-ness outside the jury’s presence and asked whether he helped Luster flee.

“It is insulting,” he snapped. “You know damn well I didn’t.”

Diamond also asked to leave the case, but Riley ordered him to stay on and defend Luster, who faces 87 criminal counts, including rape, sodomy of an uncon-scious person, sexual battery, drug possession and poisoning.

Defense attorneys, who did not give an opening statement, have maintained that Luster engaged in consensual sex with the purported victims. But prosecu-tors allege that Luster used a potent date-rape drug to knock out the alleged victims, erasing any memory of the sexual assaults.

On Tuesday, a 23-year-old former UC Santa Barbara college student, identified as David Doe, said he believes Luster drugged him and his friend, Carey, after they met at a Santa Barbara bar in July 2000. Doe said he has only a spotty mem-ory of the events that night, but testified he began feeling nauseated and tired after Luster handed him a glass of water on a dance floor.

Carey told detectives that Luster raped her at his Mussel Shoals beach house after they drove there from the bar. It was her report that led investigators to search the home, where they seized videotapes of two additional sexual encoun-ters that prosecutors contend are rapes.

Los Angeles Times

January 8, 2003 Wednesday 
Home Edition

Bill Pavelic Book “Guilty of Incompetence”

Friday, October 19th, 2007

“Guilty of Incompetence” is a hard hitting book, that will expose the facts instead of fiction, and take you behind the scenes to see how LAPD and LADA helped create the OJ Simpson “race card”, covered up the existence of suspect “Charlie”, mismanaged the investigation and botched the “Trial of the Century”.

Discuss Guilty of Incompetence - The Book By Bill Pavelic

The Machiavelli of Muck: Anthony Pellicano’s Double-Dealing

Saturday, September 1st, 2007

The Machiavelli of muck: Anthony Pellicano’s double-dealing made him Hollywood’s top investigator. Then it all fell apart.

Domanick, Joe

THE PALE, AGING PRISONERS IN THE ARMY GREEN WINDBREAKER, navy blue pants, and leg irons exits the U.S. courtroom in Los Angeles doing the chain-gang shuffle with the line of men to whom he’s shackled. Already incarcerated for more than three years, Anthony Pellicano has just learned on this May 2007 day that it will be nine more months before he stands trial on 112 counts of wiretapping, identity theft, racketeering, conspiracy, witness tampering, and destruction of evidence, charges that could land him in prison for a decade or more. Until next February he’ll be forced to sit in a cell in the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown L.A., jailed without bail as a flight risk.

Once Hollywood’s charismatic, high-flying private eye to the stars, the 63-year-old Pellicano now appears small and stooped, his ample nose made more prominent by a new gauntness. His jowls are loose and hanging, his mouth is sad and downturned–a look, given his receding chin and balding pate, that puts one in mind of Homer Simpson.

Just a handful of reporters have shown up for the hearing, and their articles, if they appear at all, will be consigned to the back pages, the surest sign that the man once thought to be at the center of Hollywood’s own Watergate scandal is fast fading into irrelevance. A story that was supposed to blow the lid off the Industry has instead come to seem about as scandalous as kissing your sister. It’s a remarkable denouement in a prosecution that once promised to suck in some of the Industry’s biggest names.

Pellicano’s troubles began with a November 2002 raid by FBI agents on his detective agency offices in a swank 12-story glass tower on the western end of the Sunset Strip. The raid was triggered by a tip from a jailhouse informant alleging that Pellicano was behind a bizarre incident the previous June, when a rose, a dead fish, and a cardboard sign reading STOP were left on the cracked windshield of an Audi belonging to then-Los Angeles Times reporter Anita Busch. She had been investigating a connection between the actor Steven Seagal–an old client of Pellicano’s–and an organized-crime figure. Pellicano never faced federal charges in the incident (although a single count growing out of the case has been filed by the L.A. County district attorney). Nevertheless, it was enough to set up all that followed.

As the agents fanned out, Pellicano showed them two loaded handguns in a desk drawer and opened two combination floor safes. Inside were two hand grenades, military-grade plastic C-4 explosives, a detonator, jewelry, gold coins and bullion, and $200,000 in cash. In subsequent searches, agents carted off 36 pieces of electronic equipment, including wiretapping software, computer hard drives and storage files, 150,000 pages of documents, encrypted transcripts of phone conversations, and more than 1,300 tape recordings.

About a year later Pellicano pleaded guilty to possessing illegal explosives and was sentenced to 27 to 32 months in federal prison. On the day before he was scheduled for release in February 2006, he wash it with the multi count federal wiretapping indictment. When the indictment came down, Hollywood was awash in speculation about who would be next. Thus far 11 others have been charged or have pleaded guilty, including Pellicano clients Terry Christensen, the attorney to multibillionaire Kirk Kerkorian; Die Hard director John McTiernan; Sandra Carradine, former wife of actor Keith Carradine; three other clients; two police officers; two phone company employees; and a software programmer.

No small potatoes by any means, but hardly the Hollywood kingpins whose names had been bandied about. Chief among them–and named by prosecutors as a “person of interest”–was Bert Fields, il cupo di tutti capi of entertainment attorneys and a man with whom Pellicano had been closely associated for more than a decade. Fields’s clients include Brad Grey, a manager and producer at the time and now the chairman of Paramount Pictures, who was locked in ugly, high-stakes lawsuits with actor-comedian Garry Shandling and screenwriter “Bo” Zenga. Both of them–in addition to four others linked to Fields’s clients–allegedly were wiretapped by Pellicano.

Then there was Michael Ovitz, the former head of Creative Artists Agency. According to summaries of FBI interviews of Ovitz obtained by The New York Times, in early 2002, Ovitz paid Pellicano to gather dirt on 15 to 20 people, including high-level former CAA agents and partners he was at war with, like current Universal Studios head Ron Meyer, Richard Lovett, Kevin Huvane, and Bryan Lourd. New York Times reporter Bernard Weinraub and Busch, who had been writing critical articles about Ovitz’s financial difficulties, were also targeted.

There’s been no shortage of speculation, but it’s unlikely that Fields, Ovitz, or any of those not already indicted ever will be. Federal prosecutors, signaling they were ready to go ahead with their case at the hearing in May, unsuccessfully opposed postponing the trial until February. The statute of limitations has run out on many of the potential crimes.

Meanwhile, Pellicano remains in jail, vowing to take his punishment “like a man” and refusing to implicate others in the wide-ranging wiretapping scheme he created. According to the indictment, that scheme was devised to gather and use information to secretly gain “a tactical advantage in litigation by learning [his] opponents’ plans, strategies, and perceived strengths and weaknesses and other personal information of a confidential, embarrassing or incriminating nature.” Among the 63 wiretapping victims were Sylvester Stallone, Keith Carradine, Kevin Nealon, and Donna Dubrow, the former wife of McTiernan.

Pellicano never responded to interview requests left with his lawyer. Whatever the outcome of Pellicano’s trial, he’ll go down in pop history as one of Hollywood’s great characters. He’s the Rudy Giuliani of private eyes: audacious, narcissistic, emotionally immature, and egomaniacal, a guy who sold exactly what Giuliani is now hawking–protection. Working for people who wanted their toilets scrubbed without getting their fingers dirty, for two decades Pellicano played his role of Hollywood factotum to perfection, an all-service provider presenting himself to his clients as their consigliere, operative, and intimidator. He conveyed that he was someone possessing a great cache of knowledge, someone who knew guys who knew guys and could solve any problem–just like Mr. wolf in Pulp Fiction. “I need everything from refinement [to threats with] baseball bats,” the singer Courtney Love once told him in a tape leaked to The New York Times. “And I need them all under one roof … when I have a problem of any stripe–A to Z,I can go to you. That’s what I need.” To which Pellicano replied: “Listen, Courtney, if you come to me, that’s the end of that. I’m an old-style Sicilian. I only go one way. My clients are my family, and that’s it.”

“He took care of people’s problems,” his wife, Kat, told a New York Times reporter. “That’s what he did for a living. And he did it very well.”

But what has been frequently overlooked is that he was also an astonishing self-creation. He came to the land of make-believe and fooled the people whose business it is to spin tales and create lies, fooled them into believing the myth of Anthony Pellicano: the world’s greatest private investigator; the smartest-guy-in-the-room Mensa member; the super expert in the esoteric quasi-science of voice and audio identification technology; the tracer of missing persons extraordinaire. Hiding in plain sight was a prime-time bullshitter and first-rate showman.

His black-bag jobs, dirty tricks, anonymous threatening late-night phone calls, and thug-for-hire intimidations were common knowledge among high-end divorce and paternity lawyers and Hollywood reporters. Rather than obscuring what he did, Pellicano made it his brand, thriving on the notion that he was a mobbed-out guy. The mere chance that you could be exposing yourself or your family to such a man worked wonders for him, and people backed away when he pushed.

He dressed in expensive double-breasted wise-guy suits and leather jackets set off by patent leather shoes, man-with-no-eyes shades, and a pinkie ring. He slicked back his thinning hair, doused himself with cologne, and popped Chiclets the way Kojak used to suck on lollipops. He was, said Kat, “the only man I ever met that could make a silk shirt look like polyester.” In the ’80s, he papered the walls of his office in bordello red velvet, later graduating to a hipper decor, highlighted by black leather furniture. His oak-finished office doors were painted in gold lettering announcing that you were entering the Pellicano Investigative Agency Ltd./Forensic Audio Lab/Syllogistic Research Group. He installed what he claimed was the latest in audio analysis equipment. He had his receptionist talk over the piped-in Puccini and offer cappuccinos to prospective clients. Once visitors were led through the hallways lined with framed magazine articles heralding the magnificence of himself, he played the role of professional goombah. “What can I tell ya,” he would say with a shrug. “I’m Sicilian.”

“He was like a hungry kid looking at a candy store when he talked about the mob,” says novelist Jacquelyn Mitchard, who spent time as a young reporter with Pellicano in the late ’70s. “He loved to play up his connections, making a point of referring to ‘Lucky’ Luciano as ‘Paul’–because that’s what real mob guys did. It was kind of sad. He always reminded me of Butch Cassidy looking back to a time that was over, refusing to believe there was just no place for a gunslinger anymore.” More recently, Sunday night–Sopranos night–had become a sacred rite for Pellicano. He prepared for High Mass on HBO with a massage from Kat and enforced absolute silence throughout the house.

He billed himself as a kung fu master and bragged that he carried a Louisville Slugger in the trunk of his car–just in case. What frightened some intrigued others, who seemed to view Pellicano as an actor in his own amazing movie. In the early ’90s, he worked with producer-director Michael Mann, developing a television series for NBC while also writing a screenplay based on his experiences. Neither the show nor the movie ever materialized, but just before Pellicano’s arrest, his client Brad Grey had been in talks with HBO about developing a similar series.

His specialty was unique for a private eye: protecting the image of stars. That’s why Michael Jackson, Roseanne Barr, Kevin Costner, Tom Cruise, John Travolta, James Woods, Farrah Fawcett, Sylvester Stallone, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Chris Rock sought him out. Just how much they valued his protection was demonstrated by a phone call from Rock to Pellicano in 2001, asking for help in neutralizing an accusation that he’d had sex with a woman without her consent. “I’m better off getting caught with … needles in my arms,” he told Pellicano in a tape leaked to The New York Times. “Needles with pictures [saying,]’Here’s Chris Rock shooting heroin: [That would be] a much [lesser] blow to the career.” No charges were filed.

His reputation enabled him to charge a $25,000 retainer, to live in a million-dollar canyon-view home in suburban Ventura County an hour and a half drive from his work, to take Kat to the best hotels and restaurants, to drive a classic two-seater Mercedes, a jet-black Lexus SUV, and a second Mercedes, and to own a West Hollywood condo in a building a short walk from his high-priced office.

Attorneys, producers, agents, and film executives loved him, too. Ovitz admired Pellicano’s “innovativeness and resourcefulness.” Producer Don Simpson saw him as a fierce protector of his clients, a “lion at the gate” whom you never wanted to be “on the wrong side of.” And attorneys Bert Fields and Howard Weitzman considered Pellicano an invaluable investigator. Weitzman admired his “rock-solid loyalty,” Fields his efficiency. “Time after time,” says Fields, “he comes up with the witness I’m looking for. He gets results.”

How he got them only Pellicano really knew until that life-defining, career-destroying 2002 search of his office. Before then, everybody in Hollywood–including the media–was drinking Pellicano’s Kool-Aid in huge gulps. Only the spin varied: Either he was a Mensa man/techno genius or a bat-wielding Mafia thug. But the truth was much more complex and, therefore, far more interesting.

THE GRANDSON OF SICILIAN IMMIGRANTS, Anthony Joseph Pellicano was born in Chicago in 1944. A grandfather had anglicized the family name; the grandson would later restore it. He was raised by a divorced single mother on the mob-dominated, Italian-immigrant streets of Cicero, a ten-minute ride from Chicago. Cicero was then a place where guys wore wife-beater T-shirts with suspenders and played pinochle on the stoop, where the Irish priests ate their pork chops, peas, and boiled-potato dinners out on Saturday night, and people were happy that their daughter Rose went to novena with the niece of a local gangster. Al Capone set up his headquarters there when Chicago police started busting his speakeasies and gambling operations; by the 1960s, it was billed as “the Walled City of the Syndicate” and was filled with strip clubs, gambling joints, and bars.

His mother, Pellicano once said, was a “working lady who never made more than $150 a week,” and he was forced to “fend for himself at age 14 [working in] a barbershop for a dollar an hour and a lesson cutting hair.” By his own description, he was a “hot-tempered, skinny little kid who lived by [my] wits”; neither of his parents, he said, “gave me any education at all.” Possessing “the attention span of a hyper kinetic six-year-old,” he left high school at 16.

In the early ’60s, he joined the U.S. Army Signal Corps and received his GED while serving as a cryptographer, coding and decoding messages. “When I got out,” he told Playboy magazine, “the majority of people who were doing crypto work were in cosmetics or toy manufacturing…. It wasn’t all that thrilling to me.” Instead he took a job chasing deadbeats for the Spiegel catalog company.

In 1969, he opened his own private-eye firm, focusing on collections and the removal of secretly placed surveillance equipment. He liked to wear huge, amber-tinted aviator glasses and three-piece jeans suits with foot-long collars and huge knotted ties; in repose he was almost handsome, with curly dark hair, large, heavy-lidded, expressive eyes, and full lips–the effect broken only when he smiled and revealed large, uneven buckteeth. On occasion he wore a white lab smock embroidered with an eye surrounded by concentric circles, the symbol of his detective agency, Fortune Enterprises. In 1974, he filed for bankruptcy, a setback he blithely ignored as he hired a press agent and launched an all-out assault on the gullibility of the Chicago press.

Throughout the mid-1970s, he sold the legend of “Tony” Pellicano to anyone who would listen. His message was simple: He was the baddest, sagest practitioner of the “praying mantis style of kung fu.” He had a “100 percent success rate” in tracking down exactly 3,968 missing persons. Most amazingly, they were all “cases other people couldn’t solve.”

There he was on Channel 7 talking about runaway teens, on WBBM radio discussing “the families of missing persons,” flying to New York to appear on To Tell the Truth, and then back to Chicago to do Friday Night with Steve Edwards. Then it was over to the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University to speak as “one of the top debugging experts in the United States” and off to lecture at the Phi Alpha Delta Law Fraternity at Chicago-Kent College. He went to Marquette University Law School to make a presentation on the “psychological stress evaluator,” then to the Maywood Rotary Club, then to the International Association of Bomb Technicians and Investigators.

At the same time, he was playing footsie with seemingly every reporter in Chicago. They gushed over his plush office, with its silver walls, black furniture, and full-length mirrors in the waiting room. They marveled over the mammoth gold zodiac that dominated his office–beneath which hung samurai swords and two nunchaku sticks, which he’d take off the wall to demonstrate how he could kill a reporter, while his pet piranha looked on.

He didn’t carry a gun, he told Oui magazine, “because my hands are lethal weapons.” In fact, he couldn’t legally carry a gun because he’d never been employed by a law enforcement agency. He recounted how he was knifed in a Mexican bar while working on a kidnapping case but “went into my kung fu stance and beat the hell out of him.” He boasted of having $300,000 worth of electronic equipment, an unlikely possibility given that in his bankruptcy he’d listed his assets as $50 in clothes and $28 in cash. Nevertheless, he was good at finding people.

Even his bankruptcy fed the Pellicano myth, for it revealed that he’d received a $30,000 loan from a friend, Paul DeLucia Jr., the son of mobster Felice DeLucia (aka Paul “the Waiter” Ricca). He was also a pallbearer at the eider DeLucia’s 1972 funeral and named DeLucia Jr. the godfather of one of his daughters. He claimed that the younger DeLucia “was just like any guy in the neighborhood.” From then on he both denied and promoted his mob connections as it served his purposes. The governor of Illinois took the loan seriously enough, however, to force Pellicano to resign from a state law enforcement advisory board.

A recent story from the Chicago Sun-Times alleges, with little evidence, that Pellicano was once a member of Chicago gangster Joseph “Joey the Clown” Lombardo’s crew and had done investigative work for Lombardo in 1974, helping clear him as a suspect in a murder case. But as Joe Paolella, a former Secret Service agent from Chicago says, “Pellicano never promoted being connected in Chicago the way he did in L.A.–a place where he could portray himself as some kind of mob guy to an upper-middle-class Hollywood clientèle that didn’t know any better, if you’re a real crook in Chicago, you don’t want anybody to know about it.” In any case, there’s no public record of Pellicano being arrested or convicted of a crime before the 2002 FBI raid, of his having his record sealed, or of any significant association with organized crime in L.A. Nor for that matter has there surfaced any public or police complaint against him for using his famous Louisville Slugger in an assault. Stare-downs, threatening phone calls, and intimidation, yes, but actual physical violence, well, the proof is hard to come by.

What’s clearer, however, is that like Johnny Fontane–the Frank Sinatra character in The Godfather–Anthony Pellicano did gain fame with a grotesque assist. In 1977, after 19 years of resting peacefully in a small Jewish cemetery in Forest Park, Illinois, the body of Elizabeth Taylor’s third husband, Hollywood producer Mike Todd, was stolen by grave robbers. They’d moved his tombstone, pried open his bronze coffin, and made off with his remains. Eight local cops searched the graveyard without finding the body. Then the police heard from Pellicano, who told them he’d received “a number of phone calls” revealing Todd’s location. Arriving at the cemetery with a local Channel 2 news anchor and a camera crew, Pellicano found bones and Todd’s old belt buckle in a pile of mud, leaves, and branches about 75 yards from his grave. The robbers, Pellicano later told the police, had hoped to find “a ten-karat diamond ring,” a gift from Taylor they mistakenly thought had been buried with Todd. Accused of orchestrating the incident as a publicity stunt, Pellicano denied it, asking, “Why would I need publicity?”

The incident caught the attention of defense attorney Howard Weitzman, who brought Pellicano to Los Angeles. (He left his wife and five kids in Chicago.) Together they would work on the case that made both their careers: the 1983 drug-entrapment trial of automaker John DeLorean. Desperately trying to raise money to save his company from bankruptcy, DeLorean ran into a government sting fueled by a paid informant and ambitious federal prosecutors. DeLorean was acquitted, and Weitzman gave Pellicano a large share of the credit for tarnishing the informant. That kind of attention had not been showered on a private eye in Hollywood since the days of Fred Otash.

A rogue ex-LAPD vice detective, Otash was also a pimp, wire-tapper, friend to Mickey Cohen, and informant to the FBI on Cohen and fellow L.A. mobster Johnny Roselli. Otash always wanted to be “Hollywood’s most spectacular private eye,” newspaper columnist Paul Coates wrote in 1959, “and had made it a special point to cultivate the right people. Attorneys, the movie set, the TV crowd.” After which he made it a point to exploit them. There are unconfirmed reports that Otash, who died in L.A. in 1992, mentored Pellicano, who arrived in the early ’80s.

Born in Massachusetts in 1922, Otash worked as a lifeguard at the Miami Biltmore Hotel before enlisting in the Marine Corps in 1942. Discharged in 1945, he joined the LAPD and operated undercover out of the Palladium nightclub, where he met both lowlifes and stars. He allegedly ran a prostitution ring with the bartender. Forced to resign from the department in 1955, he was hired as a private eye by Confidential magazine, the fountainhead for much that’s cheap and tawdry in the media today.

Confidential’s 1950s heyday synchronized perfectly with the final days of the Hollywood star system. For decades the studios had maintained their own security forces to shield their stars from unfavorable publicity and had worked hand in glove with the Los Angeles, Culver City, and Beverly Hills police departments. They would receive a call from the cops about a star they’d arrested but not booked, send a studio rep to get him, cover things up, and take him home and put him to bed.

Using what an FBI report called “a seemingly inexhaustible list of call girls” who brought information to him, Otash cultivated sources for Confidential. Otash and Confidential spied on Rock Hudson talking about his homosexuality, and then played the tape for Columbia studio boss Harry Cohn–who agreed to become an informant in return for the magazine’s not outing Hudson. Operating a sound truck stocked with surveillance and wiretapping equipment, Otash broke into the homes of Marilyn Monroe and Peter Lawford to get information on the Kennedys. At 3 a.m. on the night Monroe died of a drug overdose, Lawford, as Otash later told it, called him to sweep the house of bugs before calling an ambulance.

Eventually Otash had his PI’s license revoked, and the stars and studios banded together with a California senate investigating committee to sue Confidential for criminal libel.

************

The case ended in a mistrial, but the magazine went broke defending itself and folded, bringing the era to a close.

Pellicano brought to Los Angeles several personal traits that would serve him well: an adoration of old-school Mafia values that resonated deeply among people who found it difficult to differentiate between the movie fictions they created and reality, and an easy, soothing intimacy, it was all “buddy” and “pal” and “honey” on the phone to both women and men.

He was also “a very charismatic, eccentric, entertaining personality with an entrepreneurial spirit that allowed him to make phone calls and ask for work,” says Howard Weitzman. “People were impressed by that and by his ability to [subsequently] follow up and deliver information.”

Others were less impressed with the cold calls. Phoning Century City defense attorney Harland W. Braun, Pellicano hinted in an answering machine message that he was connected to the Chicago mob, as a kind of recommendation. Braun’s reaction was, “Why would I ever want to hire a guy like that?” and he never called back. But others did.

As his profile rose, so did the profile of the celebrities he worked for–or against. They included Heidi Fleiss, “Beverly Hills Madam” Elizabeth Adams, Sylvester Stallone, and Kevin Costner. He investigated the OD death of John Belushi and found the daughter Roseanne Barr had given up for adoption (and then leaked the story to the tabs).

Working with Weitzman and Fields in the early ’90s, he helped beat back allegations that Michael Jackson molested a 12-year-old boy by producing evidence of extortion by the boy’s father and damaging information about the family–a job for which he later claimed to have received $2 million. During the case, according to Diane Dimond, then a senior correspondent at Hard Copy, Pellicano tried to intimidate her and discourage her coverage critical of Jackson. She became convinced that Pellicano was tapping her phone.

Meanwhile, Pellicano was building relationships with law enforcement, reaping payments for appearing as an expert audiotape witness, and collecting numerous letters of praise. Commendations rolled in from federal prosecutors across the country, from district attorneys throughout Southern California, from two California attorneys general, from the U.S. Navy’s Judge Advocate General’s Corps, the Arizona State Senate, and the mayor of Houston.

Among the raves, hard questions rarely came up. Just how good an audio-video expert was he? How many of the letters came from law enforcement clients who were happy because they got the analysis they wanted? What is clear is that he had no formal linguistic, mathematical, or scientific education in a complex field.

Pellicano solidified his reputation as an audio-video expert during the DeLorean trial. Weitzman recalls his doing “a very good job” in his tape analysis. But according to Roger Shuy, a professor emeritus of linguistics at Georgetown University who also worked on the DeLorean defense team, Pellicano’s work was sloppy. “I reviewed the transcripts of the tapes that Pellicano made against the actual tapes,” says Shuy. “And I found dozens and dozens of places where Pellicano was in error–where the transcripts didn’t show what was on the tape. I had to go through and correct them all. It was weird, because most of the mistakes weakened the defense case and helped the prosecution.”

Shuy is hardly alone in his criticism. “I was representing one of Hollywood’s biggest agents who was in criminal trouble,” says Century City defense attorney William Graysen, “and he asked me to hire Pellicano as an expert witness. I called him, and he said, ‘I’ll cross any river and climb any mountain to do what I have to do to win the case.’ I took that to mean falsifying evidence. I went back to my client and said, ‘This guy is bad news.’ And we didn’t use him.”

During a late 1990s case in Tampa, Florida, investigated by the L.A. Times, the U.S. Attorney’s office was prosecuting a couple for the disappearance of their child based on remarks allegedly made on a secretly recorded audiotape. When the FBI failed to detect the remarks on the tape, prosecutors hired Pellicano, who declared that the alleged incriminating utterances existed and that he could clearly hear them. To which the judge replied, when they were played in court, “The government hears what no reasonably prudent listener can. It interprets what can be heard as no prudent listener would.” Federal authorities dropped the case, and the defendants were awarded $2.9 million for wrongful prosecution.

In 1990, then-freelance journalist Rod Lurie acquired a list of paid sources used by the National Enquirer and contracted to do a story about it for Los Angeles magazine. Pellicano was allegedly paid $500,000 by the Enquirer to have the story killed. The huge amount of money was an indication of how desperate the tabloid was. The Enquirer couldn’t continue to exist if its sources were burned. Moreover, the company was in the process of going public on Wall Street, and this was a terrible time to have the kind of embarrassing revelations they themselves made their living generating.

Pellicano’s way of dealing with recalcitrant reporters involved perseverance–he’d start with “I’m a tough guy, don’t luck with me,” and when that didn’t work, he’d try “I’m getting a lot of money. If you don’t think I’m going to get paid, you’re out of your mind.” He’d follow that with “You’re an intelligent guy. I really like you. I’ve checked you out” and finally graduate to bribery: “You shouldn’t write this story. I can get you six figures elsewhere.”

By the late ’80s, Pellicano had become involved in a far more complex dance with the tabloids. In 1997, Jim Mitteager, a reporter for the National Enquirer and the Globe, died of cancer. Shortly before his death, he gave hundreds of tapes he had secretly recorded to Paul Barresi, an informant and sometime investigator for Pellicano. The tapes capture little people fighting over crumbs tossed around as celebrities try to protect their images. Transcripts of the tapes provided by Barresi, a former porn star and producer currently working as an unlicensed investigator, show Pellicano trading gossip and planting stories with Mitteager and Globe reporter Cliff Dunn while paying to have other stories killed.

During a 1994 conversation, Mitteager, Dunn, and Pellicano agree to get together the following Tuesday, and Pellicano, who was working for Michael Jackson, promises to find out for them what’s happening with the L.A. grand jarls looking into child molestation accusations against the star. The reporters then inform Pellicano that actress Whoopi Goldberg, a friend and client of his, went to Saint John’s Hospital for a mammogram and that Dunn was tipped off by a hospital source that she had breast cancer (a rumor unconfirmed by Los Angeles). “I want that source,” Pellicano tells Dunn. “For how much?” replies Dunn.”What the fuck kind of question is that?” Pellicano shoots back. “You can’t say, ‘How much?’ to me. You have to give me a price and say, ‘This is what I want!’” Dunn answers, “I want five grand. Then you blow him out of the water [i.e., expose him as a source], and he’s used on every celebrity story [at the hospital].”

They next turn to Elizabeth Taylor.

Pellicano: Now let me ask you a question on Liz Taylor. You say that they are going after her?

Mitteager: Well, of course. She’s in the hospital. Liz Taylor sells goddamn books.

Pellicano: Because I don’t care what you do with her. As a matter of fact, if I can help you with her, I will…. What do you want to know on her?

Mitteager: Any story that would make the front page.

Pellicano: I know that she is fucking drinking again. That’s a fact.

Dunn: That’s something. If we can confirm that.

Pellicano: I just told you!

Dunn: I can’t say to [the Globe] lawyers that my source is Anthony Pellicano.

Mitteager: We need to work together to get some sort of network of people.

Pellicano: We’ll go further on that. But you guys are guaranteed the three grand on Tuesday.

Barresi says he worked with Pellicano on cases involving Stallone, Schwarzenegger, Jackson, Barry Bonds, and Tom Cruise. Pellicano, he says, “worked mostly with entertainment attorneys–they were his favorite clients–to keep salacious information about their clients away from the public. It was a great way for them to make big money.”

“If you find dirt on a celebrity, then you go to the attorney, or directly to the client, and say, ‘Hey, there’s a story brewing with the tabs, we need to quash it: Most celebrities are not gonna hesitate, because a celebrity is the most naive, infantile person in the world. They get preferential treatment, but if boulders fall on their head in real life, they don’t know what to do, other than dig deep into their pockets,” says Barresi. “Pellicano was the master of getting them to do that–the celebrity never knew how simple it was to put a fire out, or that sometimes there was never really a fire in the first place. There would be a story brewing, but the reporter couldn’t nail it down. So Pellicano would light the fire. He was the arsonist—and then he’d come back and put the fire out.”

Often, says private investigator Bill Pavelic, who worked for the defense on the O.J. Simpson, Robert Blake, and Phil Spector cases, “Pellicano would have the source in his hip pocket and be able to pay him right off the bat to kill the story or rumor. But he wouldn’t tell his clients that. He’d simply say, ‘I can make the problem go away.’” That fed right into the Pellicano mystique. If you’re a magician, you don’t tell the audience how you do your tricks.

Thus it’s entirely plausible that attorneys like Bert Fields were never informed about Pellicano’s illegal activities, his connections with the police, or his association with the tabloids–because he didn’t want them to know. During one phone conversation, for example, Mitteager asks if Fields knows Pellicano is getting information from tabloid reporters. “I’m not telling anybody anything,” Pellicano replies. “When Cliff [Dunn] comes to my office, I go to meet him in the fucking parking lot…. I don’t tell them [his attorney and other clients] these things. I have a cash slush fund that I use. And that’s what you guys have been getting [paid from].”

The last case Barresi says he worked on for Pellicano involved Tom Cruise. A male hustler, as Barresi tells it, asked for help in landing a book deal about a sexual relationship he’d allegedly had with Cruise, and Barresi mentioned it to Pellicano. The guy’s story, Pellicano told Mitteager in a taped phone conversation, “was so far off the wall, it was pathetic.” Well then why, asks Mitteager, “has Bert Fields jumped all over it?” (On November 20, 2002, Fields sent a letter to the accuser threatening legal action.) “Because,” replies Pellicano, Cruise “is a new client, and he has to do that shit.” The bottom line, says Barresi, was that it quickly became apparent that the accuser had made the story up. “I brought him into Pellicano’s office to be interrogated,” says Barresi, “and after it was over, it was clear his story was falling apart. But Pellicano said, ‘You know, this guy sounds credible to me.’ I know now that he wanted to create a credible case, because he couldn’t go to Bert Fields and say, ‘I got this guy who’s a kook.’” Instead, according to Barresi, “he made the guy more legit. Because that was where the money was.”

It’s a rare good moment for Anthony Pellicano–his March wedding day, a last hurrah before his trial next February. When he spots his three daughters in federal court, all holding bridesmaid’s bouquets of red roses, he raises his wrists, points to the shackles that wind around his waist, and jokes about his “new jewelry.” Standing by is Kat Jane Pellicano, a blond, animated woman of 50, draped in a white sleeveless dress. In her hands is a white shirt she’s brought for Pellicano to wear during their remarriage ceremony.

The scene is pure Pellicano, as he had invited AP reporter Linda Deutsch, the doyenne of the L.A. courthouse press corps, along with Chuck Phillips of the Los Angeles Times, People magazine’s veteran celebrity profile writer, Frank Swertlow, and the New York Times entertainment industry reporting team of David M. Halbfinger and Allison HopeWeiner (who are themselves under investigation for printing leaked grand jury tapes of conversations between Pellicano and various clients and stars).

Sitting together after the ceremony, Kat and Pellicano kiss and hold hands as they watch the vows of two other couples. Kat, a native Oklahoman and mother of four of Pellicano’s nine children, had first met her husband in 1984 while working in the Luckman Plaza tower where his offices were. She’d found him macho, which for Kat translated into attractive. By 2002, however, Pellicano’s life was falling apart. Weary of the 60-mile round-trip from his office to their Ventura County home, Pellicano took to staying overnight at their West Hollywood condo. Stressed, consumed with anger, and unable to find release, he became explosive in the office. In the mid-’90s, the Internet was making information more accessible, but private investigators had lost legal access to voter registration addresses and DMV information as resources for tracking people down. Despite his success, Pellicano was still a small businessman, still hustling for customers after 30 years on the job. He was approaching 60. “When I was representing Robert Blake during his murder case, Pellicano would call me,” says Harland Braun, “and say, ‘Robert’s friends are asking me to help out on the case: But I knew he just wanted to get his name back in the paper and get some publicity, and I told him no thanks.”

At home he was tense and moody, craving solitude, demanding that the kids not have friends over on weekends. Kat filed for a divorce that became final in September 2002. Pellicano–a man who needed the structure of a family and the support of a wife even as he ignored them–was cast adrift. Two months later, the FBI raided his office.

Alex Proctor, the small-time hood whose conversation with a government informant triggered the search of Pellicano’s office, told the informant he saw a change. “Anthony is losing it. He’s getting to an age, quite frankly, that there’s deterioration. I see it,” he said.

Pellicano’s remarriage received almost no coverage, and only Deutsch noted how happy Kat Pellicano seemed. “It’s not often,” Kat said, “that you get to marry the love of your life twice.” All had been forgiven–her driving him out of their house and divorcing him, his flying to Las Vegas on his last weekend before going to prison to marry Teresa Ann DeLucio, a 42-year-old former dancer and bartender, in a Bellagio hotel chapel. They subsequently divorced.

Before their remarriage, Kat had been unable to visit Pellicano because of detention rules limiting visits to immediate family and legal counsel. Now that would change. Cynics saw the reunion as a way to prevent Hat from having to testify against her husband. Hat had helped make the cynics’ point after Pellicano’s Vegas marriage by boasting that she’d been pressured by FBI agents but had told them nothing, even though she’d discussed her husband’s cases with him and had helped “solve half of them.” But with Pellicano in jail she was broke. As she put it to The New York Times, “What is the benefit to me of talking to them? It’s more benefit to me for Anthony to be out of jail than in jail.”

Pellicano had initially turned down the assistance of a public defender, declaring that he intended to defend himself. Cooler heads prevailed, and two respected defense attorneys volunteered to represent Pellicano pro bono. They will make the argument that the search warrant was based on the false premise that Pellicano had been involved in the threats and vandalizing of Anita Busch’s car, and that what they were really after was evidence about an entirely different case, in which Pellicano illegally wiretapped an FBI agent speaking to an Israeli businessman Pellicano was surveilling.

As a result, the defense will ask the judge to declare the original search warrant invalid, thereby negating the entire case. The chances of that happening are slim. A better shot at an acquittal will probably rest on the government’s having to prove most of its case circumstantially. Thus far prosecutors have produced only one wiretap, that of the wife and brother of Los Angeles billionaire Alec E. Gores discussing their extramarital affair. According to the government, Pellicano was hired by Gores to investigate the two lovers. Gores has already admitted that Pellicano played the tapes of their conversations for him.

A guilty verdict will probably cost Pellicano ten years in prison. Barring an acquittal, his only hope is to roll over and implicate some of the Hollywood moguls and attorneys who employed him. But as Loyola Law School professor Laurie Levenson, a former U.S. attorney, points out, “Any prosecutor would be out of his mind to try and make a case against Bert Fields based on the testimony of Pellicano–who would have zero credibility. Every word he said would have to have corroboration. They’d be fighting the best lawyers money can buy and have to convince a jury that a man of Fields’s stature would stoop to such cheap tricks.”

Consequently, assistant U.S. attorney Daniel Saunders, the lead prosecutor, appears unwilling to take a chance on any high-profile losses and has decided to focus on Pellicano, the lowest-hanging fruit. “He’s got Pellicano and Terry Christensen,” says Levenson. “When you take down a major partner in a major law firm in a city like Los Angeles, you’re making a statement and issuing a warning that lawyer abuse of the system won’t be tolerated.”

Limiting the prosecutions also means that the most compelling aspects of the case won’t be resolved: How much did Fields, Ovitz, Grey, Kerkorian, and all the rest know? How did Pellicano stay off law enforcement’s radar for so long? Was it because he was an informant, like Fred Otash? How many dirty tricks did Pellicano and his clients perpetrate? What would have been revealed if Hollywood had had its Watergate hearings?

At least Pellicano will have achieved what he’s always craved: pop immortality. Back in the early ’90s, Sylvester Stallone described Pellicano’s life as “the kind of script that can only get better as his experiences grow.” What has turned out to be so good for the script, has, however, been a disaster for the man.

Crossed Wires

12 degrees of Anthony Pellicano

BARRY BONDS

An ex-porn star claims Pellicano worked an a case involving the slugger

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

TERRY CHRISTENSEN

Attorney to the powerful has been indicted for illegal wiretapping

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

TOM CRUISE

Frequently relied on Bert Fields to make rumors go bye-bye

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

BERT FIELDS

Entertainment attorney named as a “person of interest” by the feds

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

GENNIFER FLOWERS

Her recordings of Bill Clinton received the investigator’s analysis

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

MICHAEL JACKSON

The PI helped beat back molestation charges filed against the singer

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

JOHN MCTIERNAN

The director has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about eavesdropping

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

MICHAEL OVITZ

The agent hired the snoop to spy on 15 to 20 associates and journalists

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

STEVEN SEAGAL

His alleged ties to organized crime may have triggered Pellicano’s troubles

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

GARRY SHANDLING

The comic actor has possibly been spied on by the investigator

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

DON SIMPSON

The late producer’s appetites kept Pellicano busy and helped make him rich

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

HOWARD WEITZMAN

The attorney brought the Chicago investigator to Hollywood in 1983

Spector Evidence Stolen By O.J. Team?

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

Daily News (New York)
May 3, 2007 Thursday
SPORTS FINAL EDITION

LOS ANGELES - Tooth or nail . . . or a big red herring?

Phil Spector’s murder trial was thrown into chaos yesterday when a former clerk for lawyer Robert Shapiro came forward and swore the rock mogul’s first defense team found and may have concealed a key fragment of tooth or fingernail at the crime scene.

Spector, 67, hired Shapiro, an ex-member of the O.J. Simpson defense Dream Team, immediately after he was booked for Lana Clarkson’s slaying on Feb. 3, 2003, but he later fired and sued the high-profile lawyer.

Ex-clerk Gregory Diamond kept mum until about two weeks ago regarding the al-leged evidence tampering he claims he saw during a Shapiro-led defense team visit to Spector’s mansion. Then he contacted authorities.

Diamond named Shapiro’s associate, lawyer Sara Caplan, as the person who picked up something “white, whitish and quite small” on the floor “lodged be-tween the carpet and the staircase.”

He said Caplan gave the item to Dr. Michael Baden, a forensic pathologist working for Spector’s team, who examined it and said it might be “a fragment of a tooth,” Diamond testified.

Diamond testified the white item was “passed around” to other defense team members at Spector’s house, including another ex-Simpson minion, private inves-tigator Bill Pavelic.

“I don’t know who had it last,” Diamond said.

Prosecutors suspect the tiny item could be a missing fragment of Clarkson’s acrylic thumbnail.

Diamond denied he earlier told cops he had seen Pavelic put the white frag-ment in his pocket.

“That question was put to me and I said ‘No,’ ” he replied.

The ex-law clerk’s story dovetails with a 2004 allegation that the defense team had found at the scene - and hidden away - a missing sliver of Clarkson’s nail that could prove she struggled before she died or might have tried to block the fatal shot.

But Baden testified immediately after Diamond and denied the incident ever happened.

Today, Caplan, Shapiro and other members of the defense team will be called to the hot seat to tell their sides of the story.

Spector’s Ex-Lawyer Says Forensics Expert Manipulated Evidence

Thursday, May 3rd, 2007

City News Service
May 3, 2007 Thursday

One of Phil Spector’s former attorneys testified today she saw famed forensics expert Dr. Henry Lee manipulate evidence at Spector’s Alhambra mansion after an actress was fatally shot there.

Spector, 67, is accused of killing 40-year-old Lana Clarkson in the foyer of his mansion on Feb. 3, 2003. Spector’s defense team maintains that Clarkson shot herself.

Testifying outside the presence of the jury, Sara Caplan — a Beverly Hills-based criminal defense lawyer — said that the day after the shooting, she saw Lee pick up a flat white object the size of her fingernail and put it in a vial in the foyer of Spector’s “Pyrenees Castle.”

Prosecutors have long accused Spector’s lawyers of evidence tampering, in particular a piece of a broken fingernail belonging to Clarkson. If such evidence exists, it may prove there was a struggle between Clarkson and Spector just before her death, prosecutors contend.

Caplan testified that she pointed out a few areas of interest in the foyer to Lee, who is expected to testify in the murder trial. Lee then picked up a flat white object and said it “might be interesting,” Caplan told the court. Lee then put the object in a vial, she said.

The revelation may support the testimony of Gregory Diamond, a former employee of Spector’s ex-lawyer Robert Shapiro, who claimed that Spector’s defense team manipulated evidence in the case.

Diamond, a paralegal who once worked for Shapiro, said he was in the foyer the night of Feb. 4, 2003, after homicide detectives left the scene. He testified he saw Caplan pick up a what appeared to be a tooth fragment and hand it to Dr. Michael Baden, another forensics expert. Baden has denied knowing Diamond.

On the stand today, Caplan denied picking up anything at Spector’s mansion.

“I would never touch an object at an alleged crime scene, ever,” she said.

Bill Pavelic, a private investigator working for Shapiro, confirmed Diamond was at Spector’s mansion that night.

Diamond contacted prosecutors two weeks ago, and he was interviewed by Los Angeles police officers. In court yesterday, he testified that Shapiro asked him to observe the defense team’s investigation of where Clarkson died.

That investigation occurred immediately after police finished their initial crime scene investigation at Spector’s home, Diamond testified. He said he watched the investigation for about three hours.

Under questioning from defense attorney Christopher Plourd, Diamond admitted he was a writer who pitched a law-type show to CBS in 2004. Diamond also admit-ted to contacting a Los Angeles Times reporter about the Spector case before he ever called prosecutors. He also admitted to contacting the New York Times, Court TV reporter Beth Karas and the legal Web site, thesmokinggun.com.

If Fidler rules that defense attorneys deliberately withheld evidence from prosecutors, he may impose sanctions.

Spector faces 15 years to life in prison if found guilty.

Prosecutors: Simpson Hit First Wife / A Domestic-Violence Police Call Was Reported. For The De-fense, There Was Talk That A Top Attorney Would Be Fired

Monday, October 28th, 2002

BYLINE: Andrea Ford and Jim Newton, LOS ANGELES TIMES, This article contains in-formation from the Associated Press.

SECTION: NATIONAL; Pg. A04

LENGTH: 726 words

DATELINE: LOS ANGELES

In a motion unsealed late yesterday, prosecutors for the first time said that O.J. Simpson struck his first wife and that he called her hours before he was scheduled to surrender to police last June.

The documents allege that in his call to Marquerite Simpson Thomas on June 17, Simpson said he was suicidal and had been framed for the slayings of his second wife and her friend.

The new disclosures came as Simpson’s lead trial lawyer suggested that he was considering firing at least one of the defense team’s top attorneys to settle a disruptive feud before opening statements, which are scheduled to begin tomor-row.

“No final decision has been made on that yet,” said Johnnie L. Cochran Jr., who has played an increasingly significant role in the Simpson team since last fall. “All things are possible.”

As Cochran worked to resolve the dispute, the Simpson team was confronted with public airing of the allegation that Simpson once hit his first wife, Mar-querite Thomas.

Attached to the prosecution motion unsealed yesterday is a statement of Los Angeles Police Officer Terry G. Schauer, who said he responded to a domestic- violence call at the Simpsons’ home approximately 20 years ago.

“His first wife was there with two small children,” Schauer said in a state-ment last year. “She told us that she had been hit by her husband, O.J. Simpson, who left the location. . . . Some other officers took her from the house, and, I believe, took her and the children to the Holiday Inn at Sunset and the 405 freeway, where she spent the night.”

The allegation marks the first time that Simpson has been publicly accused of striking his first wife, and it contradicts her contention that she was not a victim of domestic abuse.

In their motion, which seeks to compel Thomas to testify at Simpson’s murder trial, prosecutors also state that they want to question her about a call Simp-son made the day he was arrested in the slayings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman. He has pleaded not guilty.

“Not only can Mrs. Thomas prove prior acts of domestic violence by the defen-dant but she can testify to the statements that the defendant made on June 17, 1994, the day of his arrest,” the papers say.

Shortly before he was scheduled to turn himself in to police, Simpson called his former wife and children and “told everyone that he was ‘framed,’ for the murders and was going to commit suicide,” the motion states. “Jason (Simpson, O.J. Simpson’s older son) quickly got on the phone and told his father not to kill himself and that everyone needed him.”

The details about that call and about the latest domestic-abuse allegation surfaced amid signs that the defense team remains badly divided. In recent days, Cochran has been attempting to mediate a feud between Robert L. Shapiro and F. Lee Bailey, prominent lawyers and longtime friends whose relationship has broken over allegations of news leaks within the Simpson team.

According to sources in the team, tensions erupted when an investigator work-ing for Bailey accused Shapiro of selling a transcript of Simpson’s June 13 statement to police to the Star, a supermarket tabloid. Shapiro denied that, and the editor of the Star said this week that Shapiro was not the source of the transcript.

Seeking to root out the source of that and other leaks, sources say, an in-vestigator working with the Simpson team, former Los Angeles Police Detective Bill Pavelic also known as William Bill Pavelic and Zvonko Bill Pavelic, baited several traps for Bailey, at one point seeing to it that the Boston attorney received word of a false lead.

The feud has escalated to the point that Shapiro and Bailey are not speaking to each other and Shapiro has removed his mentor’s name from his office station-ery.

While the defense team attempts to stem its infighting, lawyers on both sides are rushing to resolve a few lingering issues before opening statements. Also unsealed yesterday was a defense motion objecting to the prosecution’s planned use of more than 200 recently announced possible witnesses.

That list, attached to the defense motion, includes Nicole Simpson’s sister Tanya Brown; Goldman’s father, Fred Goldman; former baseball star Steve Garvey; former Simpson football teammate Reggie MacKenzie; and porn actress Jennifer Peace, who has said she dated Simpson friend Al Cowlings and has information about the case.

LOAD-DATE: October 28, 2002

LANGUAGE: ENGLISH

Simpson Trial Grinds to a Halt / Delay Centers on Testimony of Ex-maid

Wednesday, March 1st, 1995

USA TODAY
March 1, 1995, Wednesday, FINAL EDITION

Judge Lance Ito halted the O.J. Simpson trial until Thursday after another explosive battle over alibi witness Rosa Lopez.

Ito first delayed cross-examination of Lopez to give prosecutors time to re-view a taped interview with Lopez that prosecutors say shows she was coached. Then Lopez balked at continuing defense questioning.

“I am very tired,” she said. “I want to go rest, sir. I don’t want any more questions.” She turned and walked away.

Lopez, who testified Monday that she saw Simpson’s white Ford Bronco parked outside his estate on June 12 about the time prosecutors say he killed his ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend Ronald Goldman, has said she wants to return to her native El Salvador to escape publicity.

Ito ordered both sides to meet in his chambers today. The conference is expected to center around two jurors. News reports have said as many as four jurors are in danger of being removed.

Prosecutors initially asked Ito to terminate Lopez’s testimony - which is be-ing videotaped for possible airing to jurors later. But prosecutor Marcia Clark said she would settle for a two-day delay. Ito whittled that down to one day.

Clark’s request followed defense lawyer Carl Douglas’ revelation Monday that he’d mistakenly neglected to share with prosecutors one of Lopez’s two sworn statements.

Douglas later told Ito the defense had turned over all statements and notes from interviews with Lopez, a former maid of Simpson’s neighbor.

But defense investigator Bill Pavelic admitted he had a tape recording of a July interview he conducted with Lopez.

“The court has seen an abuse of its generosity, an abuse of its patience and an abuse of . . . the integrity it afforded the defense,” Clark said. “Their misconduct has become so egregious.”

Defense lawyer Johnnie Cochran argued the prosecution’s “experienced lawyers” don’t need extra time to plan cross-examination of Lopez.

Clark said prosecutors need time to compare Lopez’s statements for inconsistencies.

For example, Lopez testified she saw Simpson’s car shortly after 10 p.m. The defense has repeatedly said she saw Simpson’s car at 10: 15 p.m. Prosecutors say the murders occurred about 10: 15.

Lopez appeared to be choking back sobs when Ito told her to report back Thursday.

“I am very sick, sir. I don’t eat during the day, sir,” Lopez said in Spanish translated by an interpreter. “I’m not sleeping very well, and I’m going to tell you this is not my fault to work close to Mr. Simpson, to have seen and to have heard.”

Also Tuesday, Los Angeles County supervisors voted to ask Ito to support charging media a fee to use the TV feed to help pay for the trial.

Supervisors - facing trial costs already topping $ 2.5 million - also agreed to explore selling videos of the coverage. The decision, they said, could apply to all high-profile cases.

“The county foots the bill,” said Supervisor Michael Antonovich. “This would be one way to compensate taxpayers.”

He says costs might top $ 7 million if the trial lasts until August as expected.

Lawyer Kelli Sager, representing USA TODAY and other organizations, called the plan unconstitutional. Charging fees amounts to censorship, she said. “It’s not the media’s fault that the trial is expensive.”

Simpson’s Legal ‘Dream Team’ Frays at Seams

Tuesday, January 17th, 1995

USA TODAY
January 17, 1995, Tuesday, FINAL EDITION

Fierce in-fighting on O.J. Simpson’s legal force could force the ouster of one of his marquee-name lawyers, but the team is deep enough to take a loss.

“Even a great baseball team has fights,” says civil and criminal lawyer Leo Terrell. “The prosecution still has a very tough case to prove, and that’s because of O.J.’s dream team.”

Lawyers Robert Shapiro and F. Lee Bailey appear to be in a power struggle - and one of them may not survive.

A clash of egos among the legal talents was to be expected. But the public airing is an embarrassing distraction as the team prepares to lay out its case for the jury Thursday.

Says Loyola University law professor Stanley Goldman, “They’re either going to have to kiss and make up, or one of them is going to have to go.”

The feud had been simmering for months.

Shapiro says it erupted over news leaks denigrating his role in the case. An internal investigation by former Los Angeles police detective Bill Pavelic traced the leaks to Bailey and his associates, he says.

Shapiro reacted bitterly to the reports, which he described as “very painful.” Shapiro and Bailey have a quarter-century of history together.

Shapiro began his climb as a celebrity lawyer representing Bailey in a 1982 drunken-driving case, and he regarded him as a mentor.

Bailey’s also a courtroom legend, but his work has been eclipsed of late by others.

But in recent days, it was Shapiro who appeared to slip into the background. Last week, Shapiro sat wordless next to Simpson for three days while Bailey grilled a prosecution domestic violence expert.

“Bailey may be playing more of a role than Shapiro thinks he should be doing,” Goldman says.

Eventually, Shapiro threw Bailey out of his Century City offices, took his name off his legal stationery and has refused to drive with him or have his photograph taken with him.

Any change in the chemistry of the team would enhance the growing power of lawyer Johnnie Cochran.

Shapiro said Cochran, who is writing the opening statement, would rule on his request to dump Bailey. Most experts put their money on Shapiro to remain, but Goldman points out Simpson is in charge.

“O.J. can fire any of them he wants, and Bailey’s got too much trial experience to pass over,” Goldman says.

“It must be infuriating for O.J. Simpson to see important members of his team feuding in public,” UCLA law professor Peter Arenella says. “His life is on the line.”

Thousands Marsh Simpson Hot Line

Friday, July 29th, 1994

The Houston Chronicle
July 29, 1994, Friday, 2 STAR Edition

LOS ANGELES — Encouraged by the promise of a large reward or the chance to contribute to a historic investigation, 250,000 callers have flooded a newly created hot line with tips about the O.J. Simpson murder case, while similarly besieged police have designated a full-time “”clue chaser” to run down the leads coming to them.

“It’s beyond belief,” Simpson’s lead attorney, Robert L. Shapiro, said of the hot line deluge. He said calls have become “so overwhelming” that the operators have had to install a backup recording system to keep up with the crush.

Tipsters have included private investigators with clues based largely on news reports, amateur detectives with theories implicating other would-be suspects and people claiming to have witnessed the events surrounding the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson, 35, and Ronald Lyle Goldman, 25, on June 12 outside her apartment in the Brentwood section of Los Angeles.

Although some of the tips are seemingly credible, many appear to be the products of overactive imaginations. One Maryland woman has called repeatedly to tell of dreams in which she sees another killer. To her frustration, Simpson’s camp has not gotten back to her.

“We’re hearing from every psycho and every crazy person,” said Bill Pavelic, an investigative consultant for the Simpson team. “But if I get one call in a hundred that’s a good lead, it’s worth it. ”

Investigators on both sides of the nationally publicized probe are chasing down each of their leads, reluctant to pass up information that could prove important.

The pace of tips has convinced Los Angeles Police Department officials that Simpson’s camp may be fueling the fires in part to occupy detectives who could be building a case against Simpson, 47.

Any tip that is not checked out could be used against the prosecution at trial. Simpson’s camp has made clear its intention to attack the thoroughness and competence of the investigation into their client.

Victim’s Mother Calls Simpson a Killer

Thursday, July 28th, 1994

THE DALLAS MORNING NEWS
July 28, 1994, Thursday, HOME FINAL EDITION

LOS ANGELES - For the first time in the O.J. Simpson case, a victim’s rela-tive has branded Mr. Simpson a murderer, in a lawsuit accusing him of “will-fully, wantonly and maliciously” killing Ronald Goldman.

In a wrongful-death lawsuit disclosed Wednesday, Mr. Goldman’s mother, Sharon Rufo, seeks unspecified damages for the loss of her 25-year-old son’s companion-ship and support.

Ms. Rufo, who lives in St. Louis, had not seen her son in the five years be-fore his death. She is divorced from Mr. Goldman’s father, Fred.

And at a court hearing Wednesday, Judge Lance Ito resolved a last-minute snag in testing of blood samples set to begin Thursday.

Prosecutors hope the evidence will link Mr. Simpson to the June 12 stabbings of Mr. Simpson’s ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson, 35, and Mr. Goldman, a friend of hers.

Officials at Cellmark Diagnostics, the Germantown, Md., laboratory hired by the prosecution to conduct the delicate tests, had objected to Judge Ito’s order allowing defense scientists to cut blood samples for possible independent test-ing. Judge Ito will decide later whether the defense may use 10 percent of the samples for those tests.

Cellmark officials had written to the judge explaining that the lab preferred to use its own technicians. But Judge Ito reaffirmed a ruling handed down Mon-day, saying the cuts by defense experts could proceed as scheduled.

Meanwhile, encouraged by the promise of a huge reward or the chance to con-tribute to a historic investigation, 250,000 callers have flooded a newly cre-ated hotline with tips about the O.J. Simpson murder case.

Similarly besieged police have designated a full-time “clue chaser” to run down the leads coming to them.

“It’s beyond belief,” Mr. Simpson’s lead defense attorney, Robert Shapiro told The Los Angeles Times on Wednesday. He said calls have become “so over-whelming” that the operators have had to install a special backup recording sys-tem to keep up with the crush.

Tipsters have included private investigators with clues based largely on news reports, amateur detectives with theories implicating other would-be suspects and people claiming to have witnessed the events surrounding the grisly murders.

Although some of the tips are seemingly credible, many appear to be the prod-ucts of overactive imaginations. One Maryland woman has called repeatedly to tell of dreams in which she sees another killer. To her frustration, Mr. Simp-son’s camp has not gotten back to her.

“We’re hearing from every psycho and every crazy person,” said Bill Pavelic, an investigative consultant working with the Simpson team. “But if I get one call in a hundred that’s a good lead, it’s worth it.”